tw: Shitty Brat

Cia. INFJ. ♫TV taught me how to feel now real life has no appeal♫ thirsty bitches

1 of 3607

Doctor Laser - Mojo JoJo's OKCupid Experience

doctorlaser:

OkCupid is wild

Original post by talizorah-vas-rannoch.

8:44 am with 31,590 notes

butterpaint:

"This is your badness level… its extremely high for someone your size…" 

butterpaint:

"This is your badness level… its extremely high for someone your size…" 

6:33 am . 44,505 notes . reblog?

ladynorbert:

thatmeggirl:

scriptoriana:

highenergyjewtrino:

jadelyn:

Are you fucking kidding me? Like, no, Shakespeare wouldn’t tweet a sonnet cause 140 characters is a bit short for that. Wrong medium. But you know what he would have? A very active twitter FULL OF DICK PUNS AND YOUR MOM JOKES okay. (And probably also a blog for the sonnets and longer works, that cross-posts links to twitter anyway.)
Get out of here with that pretentious anti-technology bullshit.



Are you KIDDING me? Shakespeare would LOVE Twitter, and would have the most hilarious twitter ever. The man lived for one liners. Also? Charles Dickens would be writing for Showtime. (No. Not HBO)

Odd that being creative in the constraints of iambic pentameter is classy and artistic, but being creative in the constraints of 140 characters is frivolous and stupid.

Reblogging for all the commentary.

ladynorbert:

thatmeggirl:

scriptoriana:

highenergyjewtrino:

jadelyn:

Are you fucking kidding me? Like, no, Shakespeare wouldn’t tweet a sonnet cause 140 characters is a bit short for that. Wrong medium. But you know what he would have? A very active twitter FULL OF DICK PUNS AND YOUR MOM JOKES okay. (And probably also a blog for the sonnets and longer works, that cross-posts links to twitter anyway.)

Get out of here with that pretentious anti-technology bullshit.

image

Are you KIDDING me? Shakespeare would LOVE Twitter, and would have the most hilarious twitter ever. The man lived for one liners. Also? Charles Dickens would be writing for Showtime. (No. Not HBO)

Odd that being creative in the constraints of iambic pentameter is classy and artistic, but being creative in the constraints of 140 characters is frivolous and stupid.

Reblogging for all the commentary.

4:22 am . 81,491 notes . reblog?

mermaidskey:

hemipelagicdredger:

mermaidskey:

mermaidskey:

oxidoreductase:

Lavoisier is having none of your shit.

Heeeey so fun fact: the woman in that painting is Lavoisier’s wife, Marie-Anne Pierrette Paulze, who not only acted as Lavoisier’s lab assistant but also translated English and Latin texts into French so he could read them. But she didn’t just translate, she pointed out errors in the chemistry in some of the texts. Her observations of these errors convinced Lavoisier to study combustion, which led to his discovery of oxygen. She was also critical to the publication of Lavoisier’s Elementary Treatise on Chemistry in 1789. She kept strict records of every experiment they conducted together and drew detailed diagrams of all their equipment. She also threw amazing parties and invited all the brightest minds in science so her husband could pick their brains. After Lavoisier was guillotined she secured all of his notebooks and equipment for posterity.
In short: NOBODY KICKS MADAME LAVOISIER OUT OF THE LAB.

Also, a side note: My historian husband-to-be pointed some things out to me about this painting. Notice that Madame Lavoisier is looking at the viewer, and all the light is on her, while Lavoisier himself is physically smaller than her, in shadow, and looking up to her in reverence. This isn’t a candid photograph- all of these choices are deliberate. The painting isn’t of Lavoisier- Madame Lavoisier is meant to be the central subject. 
I can just imagine Lavoisier telling all his colleagues that his wife is really the one with all the clever ideas, and them patting him on the back and telling him he’s sweet for saying so.

more like


I LOVE IT

mermaidskey:

hemipelagicdredger:

mermaidskey:

mermaidskey:

oxidoreductase:

Lavoisier is having none of your shit.

Heeeey so fun fact: the woman in that painting is Lavoisier’s wife, Marie-Anne Pierrette Paulze, who not only acted as Lavoisier’s lab assistant but also translated English and Latin texts into French so he could read them. But she didn’t just translate, she pointed out errors in the chemistry in some of the texts. Her observations of these errors convinced Lavoisier to study combustion, which led to his discovery of oxygen. She was also critical to the publication of Lavoisier’s Elementary Treatise on Chemistry in 1789. She kept strict records of every experiment they conducted together and drew detailed diagrams of all their equipment. She also threw amazing parties and invited all the brightest minds in science so her husband could pick their brains. After Lavoisier was guillotined she secured all of his notebooks and equipment for posterity.

In short: NOBODY KICKS MADAME LAVOISIER OUT OF THE LAB.

Also, a side note: My historian husband-to-be pointed some things out to me about this painting. Notice that Madame Lavoisier is looking at the viewer, and all the light is on her, while Lavoisier himself is physically smaller than her, in shadow, and looking up to her in reverence. This isn’t a candid photograph- all of these choices are deliberate. The painting isn’t of Lavoisier- Madame Lavoisier is meant to be the central subject. 

I can just imagine Lavoisier telling all his colleagues that his wife is really the one with all the clever ideas, and them patting him on the back and telling him he’s sweet for saying so.

more like

image

I LOVE IT

2:11 am . 120,514 notes . reblog?

kaniehtiio:

xcuteikinz:

gryffindorgeek7777:

mad-piper-with-a-box:

thetomska:

giddytf2:

the-last-teabender:

Robin Thicke is unapologetic about how rapey ‘Blurred Lines’ is, meanwhile the dude who parodied it issues a public apology for one word.

And that is just one reason why I love Weird Al.

It’s great that he’s addressed this but are we really supposed to believe that NO ONE during the extremely lengthy processes of writing a song, recording it, mastering it and animating the music video wouldn’t have brought it up?

Excuse me but how the hell is spastic even remotely insulting?

So I just recently learned that in the UK calling someone spastic means the same thing as calling someone retarded, only much worse.
If it makes people in the UK feel any better, people in the US literally do not know this (like literally no one I have ever met and/or know). Here being spastic is usually meant to mean something along the lines of acting like a hyper-active child (like running around in circles yelling just because they feel like it please be quiet for just 2 minutes type of child). NOBODY here uses it as a slur.
Since Weird Al is a US musician and the US music industry is pretty non-international, yeah actually I think its entirely possible that none of the people who worked on this song actually knew that spastic was considered an awful slur in some parts of the world.
And I’m like 99.9999% sure that Weird Al is genuinely very sorry that he was accidentally offensive.

^^^^^

hey tiny lesson time. ok yeah here in the UK ‘spastic’ and ‘spaz’ are derogatory. it happened after a charity was set up for people with cerebral palsy was called “the spastic society” and then people started using it as a term to mean stupid/inept/dumb and other things. and then it really took off when some guy was on blue peter in the 80s w/ cerebral palsy, they used the term spasticated to describe him and kids being the little shits they are started calling friends spastics when they did something stupid. the bbc did a ‘worst word vote' thing like 10 years ago and spastic came in second after retard. 
so yeah him apologising for that’s pretty awesome.

kaniehtiio:

xcuteikinz:

gryffindorgeek7777:

mad-piper-with-a-box:

thetomska:

giddytf2:

the-last-teabender:

Robin Thicke is unapologetic about how rapey ‘Blurred Lines’ is, meanwhile the dude who parodied it issues a public apology for one word.

And that is just one reason why I love Weird Al.

It’s great that he’s addressed this but are we really supposed to believe that NO ONE during the extremely lengthy processes of writing a song, recording it, mastering it and animating the music video wouldn’t have brought it up?

Excuse me but how the hell is spastic even remotely insulting?

So I just recently learned that in the UK calling someone spastic means the same thing as calling someone retarded, only much worse.

If it makes people in the UK feel any better, people in the US literally do not know this (like literally no one I have ever met and/or know). Here being spastic is usually meant to mean something along the lines of acting like a hyper-active child (like running around in circles yelling just because they feel like it please be quiet for just 2 minutes type of child). NOBODY here uses it as a slur.

Since Weird Al is a US musician and the US music industry is pretty non-international, yeah actually I think its entirely possible that none of the people who worked on this song actually knew that spastic was considered an awful slur in some parts of the world.

And I’m like 99.9999% sure that Weird Al is genuinely very sorry that he was accidentally offensive.

^^^^^

hey tiny lesson time. ok yeah here in the UK ‘spastic’ and ‘spaz’ are derogatory. it happened after a charity was set up for people with cerebral palsy was called “the spastic society” and then people started using it as a term to mean stupid/inept/dumb and other things. and then it really took off when some guy was on blue peter in the 80s w/ cerebral palsy, they used the term spasticated to describe him and kids being the little shits they are started calling friends spastics when they did something stupid. the bbc did a ‘worst word vote' thing like 10 years ago and spastic came in second after retard. 

so yeah him apologising for that’s pretty awesome.

11:14 pm . 83,364 notes . reblog?

cumfort:

you realize how much effort you make with a person when you don’t text them first for once and they never speak to you again

(Source: cumfort)

11:10 pm with 179,892 notes

“People feel removed from sexism. ‘I’m not a sexist, but I’m not a feminist.’ They think there’s this fuzzy middle ground. There’s no fuzzy middle ground. You either believe that women are people or you don’t. It’s that simple.”

Joss Whedon, in a gripping, insightful exploration of the word “feminist” (via goatpolice)

(Source: stuffmomnevertoldyou)

11:01 pm with 56,877 notes

10:51 pm . 483,006 notes . reblog?

shingekinokyojinheaven:

he just became like 50% carrot

(Source: lolgifs.net)

10:49 pm . 30,087 notes . reblog?

hero-of-ink:

feferi-captor:

get out your VCR’s it’s time to watch The Prince of Egypt. or you can watch it here.

please don’t watch exodus: gods and kings because it’s icky and racist. you deserve better. you deserve the prince of egypt.

May I also add that The Prince of Egypt’s accuracy has been approved by not only Christianity, but by Judaism and Islam as well! So it’s actually the most accurately told version out there!

vinegod:

I’m gonna be the best dad… by Thomas Sanders

theme credit